Today I am going to write about the differences between writing and editing. It has always been a important element of writing as well as a isolated function, but as self-publishing, online and in print, has become omnipresent, it’s important for writers to realize the difference. A discussion of the changes may also help you confirm where your strength lies at the same time.
It is communal for the people to double up as editors and writers at all. I am among the many that do it actually. But most people always feel more adept in one role or the other at all. I have written news and feature articles and opinion pieces and other satisfied for newspapers and other media, as well as these posts. Now I actually prefer editing from this two.
What is Difference between Writing and Editing?
Writing is known as a proactive process:
Whether one is given a topic or comes up with one, writing is considered as an act of creation in which the writer calls forth the idea at all, the scope, the tone, and the structure of the work. It is also a great challenge, in that it is the writer’s accountability to produce a complete piece of content at the same time.
Editing, by contrast, is really reactive: One is allocated a piece of content, and one’s task is to improve the writer’s effort, by helping him or her achieve the goal he or she was reaching for eventually. This assistance may be negligible, or it may amount to sporadic or wholesale rewriting, but it is a reaction to the initial product.
Writing can be flowing process. It’s tempting to frequently circle back and polish one’s prose, but the most effectual procedure is to produce the whole and then review it at the same time, replacing flat words with more vivid ones, reshaping the images, and rebuilding phrases, clauses, sentences, and paragraphs at all.
This process doesn’t, except for opportunities the editor has that are the key to the success of the content: The writer is generally expressively invested in the work. It is the idea, or an expression of or a response to another’s ideas and it often is regarded with the writer’s name. Actually it belongs to the writer at all.
The editor, on the other hand, is really dispassionate — more or less interested in, maybe even enthusiastic about, the topic, but not possessive at all. The document is a puzzle to work out. The editor has specialized pride and a desire to enlarge the writer’s efforts and make the piece the best that it may be, but this is done at an intelligent remove.
Writers should be devoted to careful crafting of the document, following the rules and agreements ranging in difficulty from comma placement to story organization.
Editors must be devoted to this task, because although their name may never seem, they have been trusted with the care of the document. Whether one is a copy editor, presence to the mechanics and the form, or a developing editor, shaping and finessing the whole, the writer’s brainchild is in one’s hands, and that is a responsibility as grave as the writer’s charge to crop his or her best possible work at all.
I think you have got the clear idea on Difference between Writing and Editing from this article. Thank you very much for visit to us. Oh yes, don’t forget to share this article to your friends.